🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.